Anthropic expands independent evaluators for its models and safety practices
Original titleAn update on independent evaluators
- Outlet
- Anthropic News
- Published
- Importance
- 3/5
Summary
Anthropic announced it is giving METR, SecureBio, and Accenture employee-like access to evaluate its models and safety practices, with results to be publicly released. The company is also in early discussions with other organizations including Hugging Face as part of its commitment to third-party assessment.
Original excerpt
Last month, we committed to stronger independent, third-party assessment of our models and safety practices. We also signed the White House Accord on Super Intelligence, in which companies pledged to partner with independent external auditors or evaluators. Today, we’re announcing that we’ve started to give employee-like access to a team from METR, a nonprofit that evaluates frontier AI models. METR will publish the results of its risk assessments. Over the past year, we’ve worked with METR on several reviews of our Risk Reports. We’re also working with SecureBio and Accenture as evaluators, and are in early discussions with several other organizations, including Hugging Face. Here, we explain our approach to working with evaluators. Why we work with independent evaluators As models have become more powerful, they’ve required stronger safeguards and more challenging risk assessments. We want to be publicly accountable for the decisions we’re making. But we can’t publicly share all the information relevant to our safety work. Some of it could be useful to malicious actors, or is commercially sensitive, like compute or training information. Instead, we’re giving third-party evaluators deep access to our information, and are having them share evidence and reasoned conclusions about the risks involved in building our models. We aim to close the gap between what evaluators understand about a frontier AI company’s systems and what the company itself understands. To evaluate frontier models, evaluators need the following: Expertise in assessing the capabilities of frontier models, including understanding the way evaluations can go wrong, such as alignment faking. Independence: they shouldn’t hold equity in the company they’re evaluating, or be financially or operationally dependent on it. Enough access to meaningfully evaluate risks. Beyond access to the latest models, evaluators also need visibility into how those models were trained, about how our safeguards function, an